<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPad magazine subscriptions will cost at least twice as much as print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/06/01/ipad-magazine-subscriptions-will-cost-twice-as-much-as-print/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://businessjournalism.org/2010/06/01/ipad-magazine-subscriptions-will-cost-twice-as-much-as-print/</link>
	<description>Reynolds Center helps journalists Cover Business Better Free training, workshops, Webinars Donald W. Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:21:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://businessjournalism.org/2010/06/01/ipad-magazine-subscriptions-will-cost-twice-as-much-as-print/comment-page-1/#comment-5581</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessjournalism.org/?p=12782#comment-5581</guid>
		<description>I really wonder why newspaper &amp; magazine producers can&#039;t understand K.I.S.S.? People want/expect to pay the same if not less for the digital subscription as the paper version. Unfortunately, the content producers seem to think they need to make a statement and blow enormous sums of money on eye candy. In order to accomplish this, they have to charge three - four times as much as the paper-subscription price to recoup their losses. The Wired app is the perfect example of this. Seriously, who in their right mind thought half-a-gig file size was acceptable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wonder why newspaper &amp; magazine producers can&#8217;t understand K.I.S.S.? People want/expect to pay the same if not less for the digital subscription as the paper version. Unfortunately, the content producers seem to think they need to make a statement and blow enormous sums of money on eye candy. In order to accomplish this, they have to charge three &#8211; four times as much as the paper-subscription price to recoup their losses. The Wired app is the perfect example of this. Seriously, who in their right mind thought half-a-gig file size was acceptable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

