Login | Help

banner ad
4

‘Gold rush’ for medical e-records firms seeking stimulus funds

Fred Schulte, reporter for The Huffington Post Investigative Fund

Fred Schulte

LAS VEGAS — Fred Schulte, senior reporter with the Huffington Post Investigative Fund, told IRE attendees to expect a “gold rush” for the 200 to 300 electronic-medical-records firms seeking to get a piece of the billions of dollars in federal stimulus funds for health IT. 

He advised local reporters to look at the 60 contracts already awarded for regional extension centers. According to the government website on the program, the centers will help health-care providers ”quickly become adept and meaningful users of electronic health records.”

He said the government is expected to spend $2 billion on the regional centers, $27 billion at hundreds of thousands of doctors’ offices and 5,000 hospitals, and $1 billion for comparative-effectiveness research on various treatments.  

Doctors can get up to $44,000 each. Hospitals will average $5 million, but for large institutions, the investment could be up to $100 million.  “The technology companies are falling all over themselves trying to get piece of the action,” he said.

 He said vendors are promising they will meet standards that haven’t been written yet. Some are offering interest-free loans to doctors or selling free or low-cost  systems with hidden fees. He said some contracts have included gag clauses to prevent the reporting of any adverse effects from the systems.  

“There are so many local stories to do out of this,” he said. Once the standards are final, the government will list who qualifies for the money, but that information is probably a year away, he said. “Most of the money is going to be going out two, three, four years from now,” he said. 

Issues include the security of the e-records (are they encrypted?), software glitches that might cause safety concerns, ease of communication among different systems, and availability in rural areas. 

Other questions: Will tax money be wasted on poor quality software? Is the roll-out moving too fast? Are patients better off? 

Here are links Schulte provided:  

About the Author

Linda Austin is the executive director of the Donald W. Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism. A former business editor at The Philadelphia Inquirer, she spent a decade as a top newsroom leader, serving as the editor of the Lexington Herald-Leader in Kentucky; executive editor of The News-Sentinel in Fort Wayne, Ind.; and managing editor of the News & Record in Greensboro, N.C. She offers business-story ideas and notes good #bizreads @LindaAustin_

Comments (4)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. It sounds like Mr. Schulte did a great job summarizing the issues, and I agree with Ms. Austin that there are/will be a ton of local angles and great stories as the national effort to roll-out HIT unfolds in the upcoming 1-2 years.

    I would add that a great local angle is the impact that electronic health records have on the practice of medicine…physicians have great stories to tell about how the EHR improved their workflows and efficiencies, improved the quality of care they can provide, improved communication with their patients, etc.

    There’s also an angle concerning the financial impact of EHRs on small practices. Traditional EHR systems can be quite expensive, but newer, Web-based EHRs are dramatically cheaper (indeed, ours is free), so more practices can afford them.

    We’ve got tons of physicians that would be willing to share their views on these matters with you. We also publish a somewhat edgy, but always informative blog on the subject, at ehrbloggers.com, for those who are looking to get an in-depth understanding of this space.

    Please reach out to us. We can help you find some great angles and locally appealing stories!

    Glenn Laffel, MD, PhD
    Sr. VP Clinical Affairs
    Practice Fusion EMR

  2. Linda Austin says:

    Thanks for sharing, Dr. Laffel. Looks like you and your blog offer another perspective on what is and is going to be a big local story.

  3. Jim Williams, MD says:

    The vendors are selling crap HIT devices that have not been approved by the FDA. Taxpayers’ dollars are being wasted worse than in the UK.

    The suckers who buy this stuff will have nothing but heart ache. The FDA site MAUDE reports multiple deaths called in to it, even though no one has informed the doctor and nurse users to file complaints there.

    Laffel presented an interesting infomercial.

    DON’T BUY DEVICES THAT HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE FDA.

    Send in complaints to the FDA MedWatch on line using form 3500.

Leave a Comment

1) Register to join the community & comment or 2) Quick comment
Username: Username:
Email: Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
or 3) Login if you already have an account
Comment:

Switch to our mobile site