<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pew study: health-care reform coverage focused on politics, not system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://businessjournalism.org/2010/06/21/pew-study-health-care-reform-coverage-focused-on-politics-not-system/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://businessjournalism.org/2010/06/21/pew-study-health-care-reform-coverage-focused-on-politics-not-system/</link>
	<description>Reynolds Center helps journalists Cover Business Better Free training, workshops, Webinars Donald W. Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:21:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellescent Health Forums</title>
		<link>http://businessjournalism.org/2010/06/21/pew-study-health-care-reform-coverage-focused-on-politics-not-system/comment-page-1/#comment-5909</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellescent Health Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessjournalism.org/?p=13454#comment-5909</guid>
		<description>Having followed the reform news, I am surprised that only 41% was focused on the politics; it certainly felt like a lot more than that. The stories on strategy and tactics certainly seemed to be more broadly presented.

Another aspect of the reporting was significant coverage of how the bill would hurt the already weak economy. This sort of news was definitely at the expense of coverage on how health care would change if reform was passed. In the end, the bill seemed to pass simply as a result of partisan efforts rather than on the basis of its contents - a sort of popularity contest if you will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having followed the reform news, I am surprised that only 41% was focused on the politics; it certainly felt like a lot more than that. The stories on strategy and tactics certainly seemed to be more broadly presented.</p>
<p>Another aspect of the reporting was significant coverage of how the bill would hurt the already weak economy. This sort of news was definitely at the expense of coverage on how health care would change if reform was passed. In the end, the bill seemed to pass simply as a result of partisan efforts rather than on the basis of its contents &#8211; a sort of popularity contest if you will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pew study: health-care reform coverage focused on politics, not &#8230; &#124; Health Care Bill Facts</title>
		<link>http://businessjournalism.org/2010/06/21/pew-study-health-care-reform-coverage-focused-on-politics-not-system/comment-page-1/#comment-5879</link>
		<dc:creator>Pew study: health-care reform coverage focused on politics, not &#8230; &#124; Health Care Bill Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://businessjournalism.org/?p=13454#comment-5879</guid>
		<description>[...] Read this article: Pew study: health-care reform coverage focused on politics, not &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read this article: Pew study: health-care reform coverage focused on politics, not &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

