Documents needn't mean bland

BusinessWeek journalists Paul Barrett, Jack Ewing and Brian Grow detail handgun maker Glock’s success, legal battles and an assassination attempt in a story based heavily on legal documents and other paper sources. The nut graf, which comes after the company’s history is established, says:
Behind the Glock phenomenon, however, is another story, one rife with intrigue and allegations of wrongdoing. The company's hidden history raises questions about its taxpayer-financed law-and-order franchise. Is this a company that deserves the patronage of America's police?
The Sept. 10 cover story, which spans seven online pages, flows well despite having few direct quotes from interviews.
Today’s Tip: Articles driven by quotations from documents versus those from live interviews don’t have to be boring. Use your storytelling skills to craft stories that keep readers intrigued.
To help you do this, check out tips from the Nieman Conference on Narrative Journalism last year. The big point attendees cited was the need for details, which is what Paul, Jack and Brian give readers in the Glock piece. For instance, in describing the attempted assassination, they say:
…Glock [then 70] was attacked in an underground garage. The hit man, a former professional wrestler and French Legionnaire named Jacques Pecheur, bashed the businessman on the head with a rubber mallet, a technique apparently aimed at making it look like the victim had fallen down and fatally injured himself. Glock, physically fit from daily swimming—often in the frigid lake abutting his home near Klagenfurt, Austria—fought back. When police arrived, they found Glock bleeding from gashes to his skull. Pecheur, 67, was unconscious.
In this podcast interview, Paul tells how he got onto the story and how he got such good information from legal documents on this private, foreign firm.Labels: Brian Grow, BusinessWeek, court documents, details, Glock, Jack Ewing, narrative writing, Paul Barrett




