THIS IS ARCHIVED CONTENT

Visit our new site at BusinessJournalism.org

Reynolds Center Programs Daylong Workshops Online Seminars One-hour Tutorials Barlett & Steele Awards Professors Seminar Strictly Financials Seminar Research Covering Business
Business Beats
Starting Out Business Writing Business Design Business Glossary Ethics Five Questions with... Immigration Series Business Journalism Resources Job Listings Academic Programs Book Listings and Reviews Scholarships Calculators Web Resources Tutorials Article Index Workshop Registration

The Reynolds Center has announced its 2009-10 free workshop schedule.

Select a workshop and register from the drop-down menu below.

Online Seminars

The Reynolds Center registration for Fall 2009 free online seminars.

Subscribe

Hooked on Kindle
By Chris Roush

Tracking the Business Behind the Tomato
By Jonathan Higuera

Five Questions with Bill Choyke
By Jonathan Higuera

Finding the Economy's Silver Lining
By Dick Weiss

Double Whammy: Oil and Housing
By Jennifer Hopfinger

Details on Executive Comp Lead to Confusion

E-mail to a friend Print this article

By Michelle Leder
June 8, 2007

Now that proxy season is essentially over and the deadline associated with crunching executive pay numbers with it, it's time to go back and assess just how well reporters did with getting the numbers right. After all, this was the first year that such detailed information on executive compensation was available. Even for seasoned proxy readers (and I include myself in that group) the additional information and different presentation meant really digging in and reading lots of footnotes. For those new to proxy reading, the new format likely led to plenty of confusion, especially if a local reporter tried to compare their calculations to those done by the large news-wires.

Just before the start of proxy season, the Associated Press put out a 14-page guide called "Guidelines for Interpreting New Proxy Statements." The very first paragraph included this ominous warning in bold-faced type: "Our totals may differ from what other news organizations report." Indeed, it was not uncommon to see Reuters, Dow Jones, Bloomberg and the AP report markedly different compensation numbers for the same executive.

Companies, of course, were not happy about the results, especially when reporters calculated an executive's pay to be higher than it was. For example, the general counsel for diversified manufacturing company Leggett & Platt sent a stinging letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission in late April complaining that numerous reporters had gotten their compensation numbers wrong. "The AP reporter overstated his (the CEO's) compensation by $1.2 million, or 40%, because he relied exclusively on the information presented in the summary compensation table ... and disregarded information contained in the footnotes to those tables. By the time we saw the article, our local newspaper had posted it online and residents in our small community were already posting outraged comments."

While it's too early to say whether the SEC will make the summary compensation chart easier to read next year, it does make sense to brush up on your proxy-reading skills during the off season. After all, pitchers don't work on perfecting their curveball during the World Series. And reporters shouldn't only look at proxy statements when they're on deadline.

Email this article

Please enter your friend's e-mail address

Please enter your e-mail address

If you would like to include a message, please add it here:

Comments

Does anyone know where can I find those AP guidelines? I poked around online but couldn't find anything.

Thanks

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Copyright © 2008 Donald W. Reynolds National Center for Business Journalism