Two Minute Tips

Glendale takes on the Arizona Coyotes

June 12, 2015

Share this article:

The NHL season is coming to a close with the Tampa Bay Lightning and Chicago Blackhawks vying for the Stanley Cup — a matchup that’s been great for NBC’s TV ratings, as our Micheline Maynard wrote on Wednesday.

But the league’s hottest showdown this post-season might end up taking place in a courtroom.

The Glendale City Council voted Wednesday night to cancel its arena lease agreement with the Arizona Coyotes, cutting short a 15-year, $225 million deal that the council agreed to just two years ago, according to The Arizona Republic.

Of course, the team isn’t happy.

The council based the cancellation on a conflict-of-interest statute within the agreement, pointing to the Coyotes’ hiring of former Glendale City Attorney Craig Tindal.

But some local commentators, like The Republic’s EJ Montini, believe it’s really a “power play” to negotiate a better deal.

And the deal, as Montini (rather humorously) points out, hasn’t been a great one for the city.

Glendale lost more than $6.3 million on hockey and concerts at Gila River Arena through April, The Republic reports. That’s up nearly 14 percent from a year earlier. In the 2013-14 fiscal year, it lost $8.1 million on its investment in the team.

The team wasn’t much of a draw for fans this year either. The Coyotes averaged only 13,345 fans per game this last season, third lowest of any team in the NHL. Often, there were more snowbirds rooting for their home teams, like the Blackhawks and those from western Canada.

Now, litigators for the Coyotes say they will start work on $200 million worth of claims from the city. The Coyotes will also have to find a place to go, with downtown Phoenix coming up as an option.

With the Coyotes franchise now plunged into turmoil, other cities might have the opportunity to claim a hockey team. There’s hope they might find a new home in Seattle, according to, and cities like Las Vegas and Quebec have wanted a team for some time.

No matter the outcome, this is a story that reverberates elsewhere.

Back in January, our Zach Bergson wrote on how messy building and funding sports stadiums can be. This is certainly an example of how a deal between a city and a team can quickly sour.

With constant pressure to tighten budgets, cities will look to cut any expense they can. When there’s as bad as a loss as there is with the arena in Glendale, it certainly makes sense.

But there are other considerations to make as well. Having a sports team helps bring a lot of people and money to local business, but the return on the investment in stadiums isn’t always worth it.

Sports teams are obviously big business and it seems like more and more teams are using the need of publicly funded stadiums as leverage to keep a team in an area. Of course, there are legions of avid fans that will do anything to keep a team around, as the Glendale mayor and council found out Wednesday night.

For story ideas, take look into the business relationship between any sports teams in your area and the city they’re in. And remember that stadium disputes aren’t just a problem at the professional level.

High school referendums to build athletic complexes are often sold by local school boards as something that helps build communities, but many voters don’t buy into the investment. Check up on any local stadiums and fields and see if there is any need for an update. Find out how these issues are usually solved locally.


Forbes Opinion: Taxpayers lose with publicly funded stadiums.

Time: Scott Walker and the Milwaukee Bucks arena

More Like This...

Two Minute Tips

Sign up now.
Get one Tuesday.

Every Tuesday we send out a quick-read email with tips for business journalism.

Subscribers also get access to the Tip archive.

Get Two Minute Tips For Business Journalism Delivered To Your Email Every Tuesday

Two Minute Tips

Every Tuesday we send out a quick-read email with tips for business journalism. Sign up now and get one Tuesday.

Our New Look
The Reynolds Center for Business Journalism is starting 2023 with a new look that we hope better illustrates our core mission to provide accurate and authoritative resources about business journalism, in order to help both reporters and news consumers understand the importance of business news and to demystify the sometimes arcane topics it covers.
Businesses, markets, and economies move in cycles – ups and downs – which is why our new logo contains a “candlestick” chart representing increases as well as downturns, and serves as a reminder that volatility is an unavoidable attribute of modern life. But it’s also possible to prepare for volatility by being well informed, and informing the general public to help level the information playing field is the primary goal of business journalism. The Reynolds Center is committed to supporting that goal, which is why the candlestick pattern in our logo merges directly into the name of our founding sponsor, Donald W. Reynolds.
Our new logo comes with a shorter name. Business is borderless, and understanding the global links in supply chains, trade, and flows of funds and people is essential to make sense of our fast-paced, globalized world. So we’re dropping the word “National” from our name and will aim to provide content that is applicable to business news globally.
We hope you like the new look. Best wishes for 2023!