Two Minute Tips

Skip the hype and dig into reality

December 28, 2016

Share this article:

When hype gets in the way of objectivity, business reporters need to dig in. Photo "Digging For Information" by Alan Levine, Creative Commons Flickr user under 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license, cropped
When hype gets in the way of common sense, business reporters need to dig in. Photo "Digging For Information" by Alan Levine, Creative Commons Flickr user under 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) license, cropped

Hype is a constant issue in business. Companies indulge in it. PR reps dole it out by the ladle. Markets revel in it. But hype becomes a significant problem when too many people buy into positive press clippings. The wave of enthusiasm can create an air of unassailable certainty and create a gaslight effect in which reporters who sense that something may be wrong doubt themselves. If everyone else raves about a product or business, who are you to doubt?

But that is when journalists need to double-down on their skepticism. If you shouldn’t trust your mother when she says she loves you, why become credulous around people who have money on the line? If something strikes you as off, even if it’s a vague feeling, check it out. At the least you perform necessary due diligence. You might even stumble across a great story.

Check the numbers

Enron was a hot high flyer. The company was inventing new ways of making money, according to analysts and many reporters. It was also creating new ways to juggle books. With all the raves, Bethany McLean, then a reporter at Fortune, was the first journalist to seriously question the company’s numbers. She noted big information gaps in the financials regarding how the company made its money.

Her story, which ultimately ran in Fortune, was the first skeptical look. Nearly a year later, she’d seem prescient. Even McLean made a mistake in not pursuing one troubling tidbit: The CFO was a principal in two of Enron’s partnerships. As The New York Times put it:

”I knew it was weird, but the accountants had signed off on it,” she said. If the accountants, Arthur Andersen, and Enron’s board had not questioned it, she reasoned, why should she?

McLean had been an investment analyst at Goldman Sachs for three years prior to working at Fortune. However, she bowed to the pressure of expert opinion. When the experts all have a stake in the outcome, it’s time to find new ones. And when the numbers aren’t displayed, there’s usually a reason.

Remember common sense

You can also employ your experience and common sense. Writers at The Financial Times questioned the global housing market and its accompanying investment vehicles years before the Great Recession. That shouldn’t have surprised any business reporter because the underlying mechanism, which required continued trading up, didn’t make sense. People eventually reach a limit as to the percentage of their income they can devote to housing. They can no longer devote greater amounts and so they stop trading up. That undercuts the essential Ponzi scheme that was involved.

Dig deeper for sources

The Wall Street Journal’s coverage of Theranos, which won the 2016 Barlett & Steele silver award from the Reynolds Center, is a recent example. Reporter John Carreyrou knew something sounded wrong about the blood testing company’s story and lack of technology details. He kept pushing, digging for potential sources and getting help from experts who could offer a more realistic view than Theranos did.

You won’t be right every time, but good business reporting means questioning and chasing down those hunches. When something sounds too good to be true, it often is.

More Like This...

Five takeaways from recent business investigations

For business beat reporters looking for story ideas or inspiration, here are five watchdog stories to spark creativity. The stories, all published in the first seven months of 2022, touch

Think like a business owner. Not a freelancer.

Not all journalism grads will work as full-time staff for a news organization. Maybe after searching on and following up with journalism school contacts, you’ll choose to become a

Two Minute Tips

Sign up now.
Get one Tuesday.

Every Tuesday we send out a quick-read email with tips for business journalism.

Subscribers also get access to the Tip archive.

Get Two Minute Tips For Business Journalism Delivered To Your Email Every Tuesday

Two Minute Tips

Every Tuesday we send out a quick-read email with tips for business journalism. Sign up now and get one Tuesday.

Our New Look
The Reynolds Center for Business Journalism is starting 2023 with a new look that we hope better illustrates our core mission to provide accurate and authoritative resources about business journalism, in order to help both reporters and news consumers understand the importance of business news and to demystify the sometimes arcane topics it covers.
Businesses, markets, and economies move in cycles – ups and downs – which is why our new logo contains a “candlestick” chart representing increases as well as downturns, and serves as a reminder that volatility is an unavoidable attribute of modern life. But it’s also possible to prepare for volatility by being well informed, and informing the general public to help level the information playing field is the primary goal of business journalism. The Reynolds Center is committed to supporting that goal, which is why the candlestick pattern in our logo merges directly into the name of our founding sponsor, Donald W. Reynolds.
Our new logo comes with a shorter name. Business is borderless, and understanding the global links in supply chains, trade, and flows of funds and people is essential to make sense of our fast-paced, globalized world. So we’re dropping the word “National” from our name and will aim to provide content that is applicable to business news globally.
We hope you like the new look. Best wishes for 2023!